Grotta & Associates, P.C.

Call Us Today: 708-873-9500

REVIEW US
  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Divorce Issues
    • Parental Rights
    • Other Family Law Matters
  • About
    • Your First Meeting With Us
    • Firm News
    • Grotta, Thomas E.
    • Marks, Kelly D.
    • Russo, Steven S.
  • FAQ
    • Who Needs A Prenuptial Agreement?
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact
Grotta & Associates, P.C.

708-873-9500

  • Home
  • Practice Areas
    • Divorce Issues
    • Parental Rights
    • Other Family Law Matters
  • About
    • Your First Meeting With Us
    • Firm News
    • Grotta, Thomas E.
    • Marks, Kelly D.
    • Russo, Steven S.
  • FAQ
    • Who Needs A Prenuptial Agreement?
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact
REVIEW US

What should you know about the acceptance of benefits doctrine?

On behalf of Grotta & Associates, P.C. | Nov 30, 2020 | Family Law |

The acceptance of benefits doctrine stands for the proposition that you cannot go back to court to attempt to modify your divorce decree once you have accepted its benefits. 

As with most legal doctrines, however, this one has exceptions in certain situations. FindLaw reports one such exception in the case of Kramer v. Kastleman. 

Trial and appellate court proceedings 

Ms. Kramer and Mr. Kastleman were a married Texas couple who accumulated upwards of $30 million in marital assets before obtaining a divorce. Initially, the trial court issued a verbal divorce decree that incorporated the couple’s written property settlement agreement that both parties had signed. The court did not issue a written decree until about a year later. 

In the interim, Ms. Kramer went back to court, challenging the validity of the PSA on the grounds that Mr. Kastleman fraudulently induced her to sign it. He not only denied the allegation, but also argued that since Ms. Kramer had already accepted substantial benefits from the PSA, the acceptance of benefits doctrine precluded her challenge. The trial court agreed with Mr. Kastleman and denied Ms. Kramer’s petition. When she appealed, the appellate court denied her right to appeal, again based on the acceptance of benefits doctrine. She subsequently appealed to the Texas Supreme Court. 

Supreme Court decree 

The Texas Supreme Court overruled both the trial court and the appellate court, holding the acceptance of benefits doctrine inapplicable in the couple’s specific fact situation. First, it held that the trial court’s verbal divorce decree did not constitute a final decree. Second, it held that regardless of the fact that Ms. Kramer benefited from the PSA, she had not specifically intended to do so. It therefore sent the case back to the trial court with instructions to revise its ruling consistent with this one. 

While a Texas Supreme Court decision carries no binding precedential value in Illinois, you should nevertheless make sure you understand exactly what your property settlement agreement says before you sign it. 

Recent Posts

  • Is it worth it to hide assets during your divorce?
  • 3 ways to stop parental alienation in your post-divorce family
  • What is parental alienation syndrome?
  • What should you know about the acceptance of benefits doctrine?
  • Significant issues in a gray divorce

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016

Categories

  • blog
  • Child Custody
  • Divorce
  • Family Law
  • Firm News
  • Uncategorized

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network
Rated By Super Lawyers Thomas E Grotta 10 Years
National Association of Distinguished Counsel 2019
Leading Lawyers Thomas E. Grotta Peer Selected 2018
Leading Lawyers Kelly D. Marks Peer Selected 2018
National Association of Distinguished Counsel 2018
Leading Lawyers Kelly D. Marks Selected 2017
10 Best 2017 Female Attorney Client Satisfaction
emerging lawyers Kelly D. Marks Selected in 2016
Attorney And Practice Magazine's Family Law Top 10
10 Best 2015-2016 2 Years Client Satisfaction
Illinois State Bar Association
The Chicago Bar Association Founded 1874
Illinois Trial Lawyers Association
Will County Bar Association
Top Attorneys Thomas Edward Grotta 2018
Top Attorneys Thomas Edward Grotta 2018

Get Experienced Legal Help You Want

22 W. Washington Street
Suite 1500
Chicago, IL 60602
MAP & DIRECTIONS
18927 Hickory Creek Drive
Suite 115
Mokena, IL 60448
MAP & DIRECTIONS
1 S 660 Midwest Road
Suite 320
Oak Brook Terrace, IL 60181
MAP & DIRECTIONS
63 W. Jefferson
Suite 100
Joliet, IL 60432
MAP & DIRECTIONS

Phone: 708-873-9500
Fax: 708-873-9555

  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2021 Grotta & Associates, P.C.. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters